Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Nuclear weapons / The Cold War may be over, but our stalemate on nuclear testing must remain strong
Nuclear weapons, Grand strategy

June 29, 2024

The Cold War may be over, but our stalemate on nuclear testing must remain strong

By Scott Strgacich

The Pentagon is currently in the throes of a generational modernization program for the U.S. nuclear triad—comprising air, sea and land-based nuclear strike capabilities—that could cost taxpayers an estimated $1 trillion over 30 years.

The effort is vast. It includes the introduction of a new strategic bomber, a new ballistic missile submarine and a new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) system. While the B-21 Raider, the newest element of the triad’s air leg, has proven itself a rare example of a cost-effective defense procurement, the modernization program’s sea and land legs haven’t been so fortunate. Progress on the Navy’s new ballistic missile submarine, the Columbia class, has been disrupted by an inadequate defense industrial base, while the upcoming LGM-35 Sentinel ICBM was recently scandalized by the disclosure of fresh cost overruns.

But there’s one worrying dimension of the U.S. modernization effort that has failed to get sufficient attention—the new W93 nuclear warhead and its implications for the future of nuclear testing.

Read at The Hill

Author

Photo of Scott Strgacich

Scott
Strgacich

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Western Hemisphere

ExplainerAmericas, Air power, Counterterrorism

No GWOT-Narco

By Daniel DePetris and Christopher McCallion

July 2, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Alliances

US reviewing AUKUS submarine pact as part of ‘America first’ agenda

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

June 11, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy

Trump’s cost-benefit doctrine defines foreign policy, 80 years post-WWII

Featuring Edward King

June 3, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas

Don’t go down to Mexico

By John Kitch II

May 31, 2025

op-edGrand strategy

DOGE Has Its Sights on the Defense Department

By Gil Barndollar

May 9, 2025

Events on Nuclear weapons

See All Events
virtualNATO, Alliances, Deterrence, Europe and Eurasia, Nuclear weapons

Past Virtual Event: New York for Paris? NATO and extended deterrence in a new nuclear age

July 2, 2024
virtualChina, Nuclear weapons

Past Virtual Event: Raising the minimum: explaining China’s nuclear buildup

May 19, 2022
in-personNorth Korea, Asia, Deterrence, Diplomacy, Nuclear weapons

Past In-Person Event: Ending the North Korea standoff

March 5, 2018

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved