Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Israel-Hamas / Should U.S. aid to Israel be up for debate?
Israel‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

December 1, 2023

Should U.S. aid to Israel be up for debate?

By Daniel DePetris

The United States is by far Israel’s closest, most important security partner. Washington provides the Israelis $3.8 billion in military aid every year under a memorandum of understanding crafted during the Obama administration, money that comes with no strings attached. Since Israel’s founding in 1948, total U.S. aid has reached nearly $159 billion—approximately 78 percent, or $124 billion, of that sum was earmarked for military assistance.

Before the Israel-Hamas war erupted on Oct. 7, even the thought of conditioning U.S. aid to Israel was a non-starter. Yet today, after nearly two months of conflict in which more than 15,000 Gazans have been killed and more than half of northern Gaza’s buildings have been damaged, conditionality is now considered by some—particularly in the Democratic Party—as an option worth considering.

While the Biden administration and members of Congress have supported Israel’s campaign to wipe out Hamas in Gaza, concern is growing that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) are operating in a way that is, if not indiscriminate, then more lethal than it needs to be. On Nov. 8, the majority of the Senate Democratic caucus wrote a letter to President Joe Biden requesting information on how the administration is ensuring that Israel is complying with international humanitarian law. This isn’t a letter the White House can shove aside; Biden has requested $14 billion in additional military aid for Israel as part of his $106 billion national security supplemental, so concerns about Israel’s conduct in Gaza are highly relevant if the White House wants to persuade lawmakers in his own party to support the package.

Read at Newsweek

Author

Photo of Daniel DePetris

Daniel
DePetris

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

What lessons are foreign leaders taking from Donald Trump’s Iran bombing?

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, China, Iran, North Korea, Russia

There is no ‘axis of autocracy’

By Daniel DePetris

July 1, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Basing and force posture, Middle East

The Iran strike shows we don’t need bases in the Middle East

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

June 28, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Iran, Middle East, Russia

How not to do multipolarity

By Anthony Constantini

June 28, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East

The real obstacle to peace with Iran

By Rosemary Kelanic and Jennifer Kavanagh

June 25, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

Is Iran really a threat to the United States? A debate

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

June 25, 2025

Events on Israel-Hamas

See All Events
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Past Virtual Event: Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualHouthis, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Houthi conundrum: defend, degrade, or defer

March 28, 2024
virtualMiddle East, Iran, Israel‑Hamas, Israel‑Iran, Syria, Yemen

Past Virtual Event: Keeping the U.S. out of war in the Middle East

January 16, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved