Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Biden’s final foreign policy speech: an exercise in self-promotion
Grand strategy, Afghanistan, China, China‑Taiwan, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East, Taiwan, Ukraine‑Russia

January 13, 2025

Biden’s final foreign policy speech: an exercise in self-promotion

By Christopher McCallion

In his final foreign policy address as President, Joe Biden today struck a self-congratulatory note. He claimed that the United States and its allies were stronger than when he took office, while their adversaries were weaker. Yet the celebratory tone of the speech bore only a pale resemblance to the disappointing foreign policy legacy his administration will leave. Biden’s speech frequently had the odd character of claiming the goals with which he entered office had been achieved, when in fact they were frequently swept aside by subsequent events.

The outgoing President boasted that the US had been successfully outcompeting China, while also claiming that his administration had restabilised diplomatic relations with Beijing. In fact, US-China tensions have only increased over the past four years, particularly over the issue of Taiwan, which Biden himself has repeatedly claimed the US would defend if attacked. Meanwhile, the administration’s signature investments into US industry have not yet borne fruit, its export controls on Chinese tech have partially backfired, and the country’s share of global manufacturing lags well behind China’s.

Biden also touted the wars in Ukraine and Gaza as successful defences of the US-led world order that have sapped the strength of its adversaries. Yet, while it’s true that Russia was humbled following its invasion of Ukraine, it has gained what is likely an irreversible advantage in the conflict. Since the invasion, the US has exposed itself to significant escalation risks, while Ukraine has been devastated. It is highly likely that Volodymyr Zelensky will now have to buy peace at the cost of territory which could have been retained had Biden retracted the Bush administration’s foolish 2008 pledge to bring Ukraine into Nato.

Meanwhile, US support for Israel has made a mockery of the rhetoric of a “rules-based order”, as Gaza is levelled and its population pummelled. While Iran and its regional proxies have been weakened, an al-Qaeda offshoot has conquered Syria, the Right-wing Israeli government seems bent on expansion, and Tehran may feel more compelled to acquire a nuclear deterrent to shore up its eroding position.

Read at UnHerd

Author

Photo of Chris McCallion

Christopher
McCallion

Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Alliances, Iran, Middle East, NATO

Trump’s ‘Art of the Deal’ Is Losing Friends and Alienating Allies

By Daniel DePetris

April 2, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Trump seeks to redefine ‘regime change’ in Iran war

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

April 1, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

The Iran War is the Culmination of Washington’s Foreign Policy Pathologies

By Christopher McCallion

April 1, 2026

In the mediaUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Israel‑Iran, Middle East

Trump might end his war—but the rest of the world may pay the price

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

April 1, 2026

Op-edUS‑Israel‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

Trump risks falling in to the ‘asymmetric resolve’ trap in Iran—just as presidents before him did elsewhere

By William Walldorf

April 1, 2026

Q&AAlliances, Europe and Eurasia, Iran, NATO

How will the war in Iran impact U.S.-Europe relations?

By Thomas P. Cavanna

March 31, 2026

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGlobal posture, Grand strategy, Military analysis

Assessing the 2026 NDS: What comes next?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.