Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / China / Does the Hellscape strategy undermine U.S. strategic ambiguity regarding Taiwan?
China, Taiwan

July 11, 2024

Does the Hellscape strategy undermine U.S. strategic ambiguity regarding Taiwan?

By Demri Greggo

In the event that China attempts to consolidate control of Taiwan, USINDOPACOM commander Adm. Samuel Paparo detailed a strategy that may “turn the Taiwan Strait into an unmanned hellscape,” noting that he “can make their lives utterly miserable for a month, which buys me the time for the rest of everything.” According to the interview, the Hellscape strategy includes “deploying thousands of unmanned submarines, unmanned surface ships and aerial drones to flood the area and give Taiwanese, U.S. and partner forces time” to mount a response to a Chinese assault on Taiwan.

The Hellscape strategy appears to be a shaky attempt at deterrence. CIA Director William Burns expressed during an event last year that China may have the capability to consolidate Taiwan by 2027. There may be a sudden urgency in Washington to deter Beijing, and to do so quickly. The Hellscape strategy signals to China that the U.S. may contemplate a military response to a Chinese consolidation of Taiwan and that it’s working on ways to potentially stop that from happening.

Yet, publicizing the Hellscape strategy could unintentionally hasten Beijing’s efforts to gain control of Taiwan. If we assume that China may be ready to consolidate Taiwan by force by 2027, why would its leaders wait until the U.S. has the capability ready to defend it via the Hellscape strategy?

Read at Stars and Stripes

Author

Demri
Greggo

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Asia

op-edGrand strategy, Asia, China, Naval power, Taiwan

AUKUS is a flawed but sensible way to burden-share in the Pacific

By Lyle Goldstein

July 14, 2025

In the mediaUkraine‑Russia, China

Pentagon official at center of weapons pause on Ukraine wants U.S. to focus on China

Featuring Dan Caldwell

July 13, 2025

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

In the mediaGrand strategy, Asia

‘Restrainers’ propose slashing U.S. troop numbers in South Korea, Okinawa

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Americas, China, Great power competition

What is Trump’s “new realism” in foreign policy?

By Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

In the mediaChina, Asia, Taiwan

American bombs in Iran also reverberate in China and North Korea

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

July 4, 2025

Events on China

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualAsia, Basing and force posture, Burden sharing, China, Grand strategy

Past Virtual Event: Rethinking U.S. strategy in East Asia: do more bases mean more deterrence?

January 24, 2024

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved