July 14, 2024
Geography is a dealbreaker for coalition building in Asia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ace3/9ace380ce3fc5c14e3536a5516c75db9a58e3a3b" alt=""
At the 2024 Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin touted a “new convergence” between the United States and its Indo-Pacific allies and partners that is “defining a new era of security in the Indo-Pacific.” Austin came with a list of accomplishments to back it up, hailing expanded U.S. military access to bases in Australia and the Philippines, a “new era” in U.S.-Japan-South Korea trilateral cooperation, and co-production deals with India.
But this “new convergence” is more of an illusion than reality. As we argued in a longer piece in the Washington Quarterly, the United States still lacks military access to critical parts of Asia, a robust regional security network, and well-armed allies and partners capable of self-defense. Worse, trying harder will not solve these myriad problems because the region’s geography—its vast distances and maritime environment—works against coalition-building. Instead of trying to outmatch or outcompete China, Washington should acknowledge the geographic reality and build a more narrow but sustainable coalition to balance Chinese power and prevent Beijing’s regional hegemony.
Author
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6253/b6253a6a39e7f0d0a5b584cdd7fa16e82bb4ddad" alt=""
Jennifer
Kavanagh
Senior Fellow & Director of Military Analysis
More on Asia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fb68/4fb6855836b164e71f8e191c3fbecaa50ab64c12" alt=""
Featuring Benjamin Friedman
February 11, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1884f/1884fbbb0a4b2e294dc60f762b6f000a61da7b93" alt=""
February 6, 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5627/f5627eac40da6d96993b5a070dc2a0d11752371c" alt=""
By Peter Harris
January 22, 2025