Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Research
    • Briefs
    • Explainers
    • Reports
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Grand strategy / Now is the time to repeal the 2002 and 1991 AUMFs
Grand strategy, Middle East

November 21, 2024

Now is the time to repeal the 2002 and 1991 AUMFs

By Demri Greggo

Congress is back in session and with the results of the 2024 election behind us, members have a long list of items that need to get done before the new year. One item that should be added to the top of that list is a repeal of the 2002 and 1991 authorizations for the use of military force (AUMFs).

Repealing the pair of AUMFs should be a no-brainer. Keeping the authorizations on the books gives any president the legal authority to surge troops to the Middle East, even though decades have passed since the authorizations were drafted. Both the Iraq War and Gulf War are now over, meaning the AUMFs have overstayed their welcome in U.S. Code. Most importantly, the AUMFs are not used as the sole domestic legal justification for any active operations by the United States.

The 2002 and 1991 AUMFs are also not the only tool in the toolbox. Even if the AUMFs are repealed, the president can use Article II of the U.S. Constitution as legal justification if force is warranted to defend the United States. If he needs additional domestic legal authority, he can make his case to Congress, as Presidents have historically done in times of crisis.

Read at Stars and Stripes

Author

Demri
Greggo

Contributing Fellow

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edSyria, Israel, Middle East

Israel’s calculus on Syria

By Daniel DePetris and Rajan Menon

July 17, 2025

In the mediaIsrael‑Iran, Middle East

New assessment finds site at focus of U.S. strikes in Iran badly damaged

Featuring Rosemary Kelanic

July 17, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

LTE: Attacks on Iran slow nuclear programme yet solve nothing

By Daniel DePetris

July 15, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Iran, Middle East

LTE: Regime change in Tehran isn’t worth the risk

By Daniel DePetris

July 15, 2025

op-edGrand strategy, Iran, Israel, Middle East

Is the Middle East really on the verge of a new dawn?

By Daniel DePetris

July 10, 2025

ExplainerMilitary analysis, Air power, Basing and force posture, Land power, Naval power

Aligning global military posture with U.S. interests

By Jennifer Kavanagh and Dan Caldwell

July 9, 2025

Events on Grand strategy

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

Past Virtual Event: U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualChina, Alliances, Balance of power, Diplomacy, Grand strategy, Russia

Past Virtual Event: China-Russia: Cooperation or a no-limits alliance?

April 3, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Past Virtual Event: Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved