Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Iran
    • Western Hemisphere
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Europe and Eurasia / Merkel’s visit a chance for the U.S. to reassess its role in Europe
Europe and Eurasia, Alliances

July 15, 2021

Merkel’s visit a chance for the U.S. to reassess its role in Europe

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
July 15, 2021
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Biden will meet with German Chancellor Angela Merkel at the White House. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The Biden administration will want to hail the restoration of U.S. relations with Germany and other allies, but we should not exaggerate the changes from one president to the next. Despite a failed attempt by President Trump to remove some U.S. troops from Germany, the bipartisan consensus continues to favor an excessive U.S. military footprint in Europe, one better suited to the early Cold War. Today, Russia is relatively weak and European allies, starting with Germany, are prosperous and capable of taking more responsibility for their security. And the Biden administration has unfortunately followed the Trump administration in trying to dictate German energy policy, by using sanctions to oppose the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, albeit not as aggressively as some would like.

“Washington should encourage German efforts to foster strategic autonomy rather than suppressing them. We should also drastically reduce U.S. forces in Europe to encourage a shift of Europe’s defense burdens to Europeans. If U.S. allies feel compelled by the Russian threat to spend more on defense, that is good, as more capable allies are a service to U.S. interests. If they don’t spend more, we should respect their judgement and still appreciate the savings. Doing less militarily in Europe doesn’t mean having bad or distant relations with Germany, a point we can reinforce by dropping opposition to Nord Stream 2.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Europe and Eurasia

op-edNuclear weapons, Europe and Eurasia, Russia

Russia Is Offering An Informal Nuclear Deal. Washington Should Take It.

By John Grover

February 25, 2026

op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Breaking Europe’s Trans-Atlantic Habit: The End of the Senior Partner Myth

By Moritz Graefrath

February 24, 2026

op-edNATO, Alliances, Ukraine‑Russia

Europe debates the bomb

By Daniel DePetris

February 19, 2026

op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Marco Rubio’s Munich speech was an ultimatum to Europe

By Jennifer Kavanagh

February 15, 2026

In the mediaWestern Hemisphere, Grand strategy, Russia

Trump awards final contracts under U.S.-Finnish icebreaker partnership to Canada-linked defense company

Featuring Lyle Goldstein

February 11, 2026

op-edUkraine‑Russia, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Ukraine and Russia are both suffering as the war enters its fifth year

By Daniel DePetris

February 10, 2026

Events on Europe and Eurasia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Europe Edition

January 14, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved