Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • Venezuela
    • China
    • Israel-Hamas
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • NATO
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Middle East / U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria are vulnerable with no justifying security rationale
Middle East, Iraq, Syria

March 11, 2020

U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria are vulnerable with no justifying security rationale

By Daniel Davis

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
March 11, 2020
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, media reported a rocket attack on a base in Iraq killed two U.S. service members. Defense Priorities Senior Fellow Lt. Col. Daniel L. Davis, USA, Ret. issued the following statement in response:

“Opponents of our indefinite policing missions in Iraq and Syria have long warned U.S. soldiers were vulnerable to attacks with no justifying U.S. security rationale.

“Tragically, today, it appears two more U.S. service members have lost their lives. This is in addition to two U.S. Marines who were killed in Iraq on Sunday.

“The anti-ISIS military mission was long ago completed, yet Washington has kept U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria for the benefit of local actors there—not to keep America safe. This latest loss is a stark reminder of the consequences of a broken U.S. foreign policy.

“It is long past time to dissolve overly ambitious commitments in peripheral lands. The U.S. should instead focus on core security and prosperity challenges. The best policy is to withdraw all U.S. forces from Iraq, Syria, and the broader region. Not one more American should be required to sacrifice their life for a mission that doesn’t even serve vital U.S. interests.”

Author

Photo of Daniel Davis

Daniel
Davis

Senior Fellow & Military Expert

Defense Priorities

More on Middle East

op-edIran, Israel‑Hamas, Middle East

The case for diplomacy with Iran

By Geoff LaMear

December 5, 2025

op-edMiddle East

The real problem with cozying up to the Saudis

By Benjamin Friedman and Rosemary Kelanic

December 5, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Hamas, Israel, Middle East

Donald Trump’s peace plan for Gaza is on life support

By Daniel DePetris

December 2, 2025

op-edIsrael‑Iran, Middle East, Nuclear weapons

Iran escalates nuclear stand off

By Daniel DePetris

November 22, 2025

Press ReleaseMiddle East, Alliances, Diplomacy

Keep the U.S.-Saudi relationship modest

By Rosemary Kelanic

November 19, 2025

op-edMiddle East, Alliances

Saudi Arabia and the U.S. are not allies—no matter what their leaders say

By Daniel DePetris

November 19, 2025

Events on Middle East

See All Events
virtualGreat power competition, Balance of power, China, Grand strategy, Middle East

U.S.-China competition and the value of Middle East influence

June 10, 2025
virtualMiddle East, Basing and force posture, Diplomacy, Houthis, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Israel‑Hamas, Military analysis, Syria

Trump in the Middle East: Impacts, implications, and alternatives

May 16, 2025
virtualSyria, Balance of power, Basing and force posture, Counterterrorism, Middle East, Military analysis

Syria after Assad: Prospects for U.S. withdrawal

February 21, 2025

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2025 Defense Priorities All Right Reserved