Defense Priorities Defense Priorities
  • Policy Topics
    • US-Israel-Iran
    • Ukraine-Russia
    • Western Hemisphere
    • NATO
    • China
    • Syria
  • Analysis
    • Research
    • Q&A
  • Programs
    • Grand Strategy Program
    • Military Analysis Program
    • Asia Program
    • Middle East Program
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Media
  • About
    • Mission & Vision
    • People
    • Jobs
    • Contact
  • Donate
Select Page
Home / Europe and Eurasia / U.S. interests are different from Ukrainian interests
Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine‑Russia

September 21, 2023

U.S. interests are different from Ukrainian interests

By Benjamin Friedman

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
September 21, 2023
Contact: press@defensepriorities.org

WASHINGTON, DC—Today, President Biden is scheduled to host Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House. Defense Priorities Policy Director Benjamin H. Friedman issued the following statement in response:

“The United States and Ukraine have different interests, an obvious truth obscured by the rhetorical excesses favored by U.S. political leaders, especially President Biden. Ukraine has everything on the line in their war and thus want all the U.S. help they can get. They seek, for understandable reasons, to get us into direct combat with Russia.

“U.S. interests in the war are much more limited. The defeat of Russia is a good thing for Americans and already substantively accomplished. Ukraine’s success combined with Moscow’s ineptitude has blunted Russia’s threat to European allies. Ukraine regaining its pre-war borders is not a U.S. security priority. Ukraine’s success is something we may want, but it is not something we need to be safe.

“U.S. policy toward Ukraine should recognize and better reflect our differing interests. President Zelensky should be respected and aided but not treated as a savior whose instructions we follow. The Biden administration should make clear it will not allow the U.S. to be drawn into the war more deeply—and that it will never go to war for Ukraine and risk nuclear conflict for quite limited interests. That means the U.S. cannot be Ukraine’s ally via NATO or promise to protect it by other means. Washington should stop misleading Kyiv about this, which does Ukraine no favors. Finally, the administration should begin to push the burden of defending Ukraine to Europe. European states have more at stake and the collective wealth to do more.”

Author

Photo of Benjamin Friedman

Benjamin
Friedman

Policy Director

Defense Priorities

More on Europe and Eurasia

In the mediaNATO, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia

Why and How Europeans Must Prepare for U.S. Retrenchment

Featuring Justin Logan

May 28, 2026

In the mediaNATO, Europe and Eurasia

NATO’s frontline countries jockey for U.S. troops after Trump’s Germany withdrawal

Featuring Jennifer Kavanagh

May 12, 2026

Op-edEurope and Eurasia, NATO

Europe’s French nuclear shield?

By Daniel DePetris

May 7, 2026

Op-edNATO, Europe and Eurasia

Trump’s right to take troops out of Germany. Now see where they go.

By Jennifer Kavanagh

May 6, 2026

Op-edUkraine‑Russia, Drones, Europe and Eurasia, Russia, Ukraine

Drone Dominance Isn’t the Vital Lesson of Ukraine

By Gil Barndollar

May 5, 2026

Op-edNATO, Alliances, Europe and Eurasia

Why Donald Trump Doesn’t Want European Strategic Autonomy

By Thomas P. Cavanna

May 5, 2026

Events on Europe and Eurasia

See All Events
virtualEurope and Eurasia, Asia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Alignment with restraint?

February 9, 2026
virtualNATO, Alliances, Burden sharing, Europe and Eurasia, Grand strategy

Assessing the 2026 NDS: Will it usher in burden shifting?

February 9, 2026
virtualEurope and Eurasia

What’s Next for U.S. Foreign Policy in 2026? Europe Edition

January 14, 2026

Receive expert foreign policy analysis

Join the hub of realism and restraint

Expert updates and analysis to enhance your understanding of vital U.S. national security issues

Defense Priority Mono Logo

Our mission is to inform citizens, thought leaders, and policymakers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military—used more judiciously to protect America’s narrowly defined national interests—and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing restraint, diplomacy, and free trade to ensure U.S. security.

  • Research
  • Experts
  • About
  • For Media
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact
© 2026 Defense Priorities Foundation. All rights reserved.